Killing Jesus: A History by Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard review History books


I don’t know how much of that was the author’s rendition or the actor’s role playing, as the actor is Muslim. Hough one of the first films to have an ethnic middle-eastern cast, Killing Jesus is a clunky, boring and at times offensive depiction of the events leading up to the most famous execution in history. Due to the strong violence, we are awarding this film our Faith Based Seal. Jesus, especially in the beginning, is portrayed as not being sure of who he is and reluctant to accept his role. The clarity of the high definition on the Blu-ray is amazing.

According to O’Grady, Killing Jesus presents the Romans, Jewish elites, and Pharisees as categorically “bad” and “ordinary Jews” as “good”, without any background or nuance. O’Grady also criticizes O’Reilly and Dugard for relying almost entirely on the gospels and ignoring the centuries’ worth of books written by biblical scholars about the historical Jesus. The two-hour movie version of Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard’s bestselling book KILLING JESUS is not a faithful shaadistan reviews adaptation of the book. The book may be criticized for its weak historical documentation, lack of footnotes referring to specific sources, and noncommittal approach to the resurrection. However, the movie version is even weaker, giving its viewers a Jesus who’s not divine, who’s full of doubt at the beginning, though He gets stronger later. Also, unlike the book, the movie seriously plays down the divinity of Jesus and His teaching that He was the incarnate Son of God.

The director and the main actress where there and it was a lovely experience. A subdued and somber Colombian film that reminded me of Miss Bala with its similarly intimate perspective of civilian strife amid a miasma of Medellin peril. College student Paula is driving home with her father when a drive-by assassination leaves him dead in the street…but she saw the face of his killer. Fate leads to grieving daughter and young gunman to crossing paths, and consumed by rage and revenge and frustration with ineffectual police, she begins getting close to him. Although not biblically-accurate, it is one of the few movies, about Jesus, to depict His humanity. Rodriguez, in a performance that takes “brooding” to a whole new level) and makes the decision to enact her revenge.

The story has been adapted for screens large and small so often at this point that any new effort has to make clear why it needed to be made and what it’s bringing to the task that we haven’t seen before. Lebanese American actor Haaz Sleiman plays Jesus, and it is nice at least to see a Jesus of color and more or less local origin instead of the white, sometimes very white, Christ so often offered. He is a little unprepossessing for a man who stirred the multitudes, but this is true generally of the film.

Candida Moss criticizes the book for accepting this portrayal of Mary, which is not supported by the Bible or other early Christian writings. According to The Washington Times, while writing Killing Jesus, O’Reilly and Dugard found that sources were far less plentiful than for the previous books in their Killing… Bill O’Reilly stated that he believes the book was inspired by the Holy Spirit.

I watched it guardedly, but was moved by it in the end. Bill O’Reilly’s focus is the political situation in Palestine at the time, and although Jesus is the central character, the story really focuses on other people’s reaction to -and expectations of- Jesus. It’s not surprising that none of the miracles are shown on screen as the authorities had not seen them and would most likely be dismissive of them anyway. The result is high drama and tension as the authorities keep arguing over jurisdictional issues. The script, by Walon Green, opens with some terribly overbaked material, as Grammer plays King Herod addled by a nightmare vision.

This is a major contradiction that should be fixed. The best historical scholars believe Matthew was indeed written between A.D. O’Reilly and Dugard’s book KILLING JESUS has been criticized in some Christian circles because it doesn’t confirm such things as the historicity of Christ’s resurrection or the two thieves that were crucified next to Jesus. It’s also been alleged that the book doesn’t confirm the miracles of Jesus or Jesus Christ’s claims to be divine. Even his mother thinks he is overstepping himself in this ministry. Jesus founders between roles as a carpenter and an aspiring revolutionary, for a time even considering that he might be a military messiah intended to raise up an army against the authorities.



Comments are closed.